Please don’t miss my latest Daily Caller op-ed “Why Chairmen Upton/Walden Plan a Communications Act Update” – here.
The op-ed provides a foundational answer to both:
- Chairman Upton/Walden’s organizing question: “…is this working for today’s communications marketplace?” and
- Representative Dingell’s core question: What is the need for change?
This is Part 21 of my Obsolete Communications Law Series.
***
FYI: See additional background below: two key PowerPoint presentations & my Obsolete Communications Law Series.
PowerPoint: Modern Beats Obsolete in Spurring Economic Growth & Innovation: Modernize Obsolete Communications Law & Spectrum Management
Outline:
Obsolete Law & Regulation
- What makes it obsolete?
- FCC regulation is an historical anomaly
- How did this anomaly happen?
- Law ignores five technology changes
- Five ways law has held America back
- From monopoly to competitive economics
- What’s the harm from obsolete law?
Obsolete Spectrum Management
- Spectrum management is an historical anomaly
- Spectrum is a Resource management outlier
- Spectrum is the worst managed resource
- Obvious waste of government spectrum
- How did this anomaly happen?
- Why is U.S. spectrum management so dysfunctional?
Conclusions
Recommendations
PowerPoint: A Modern Vision for the FCC: How the FCC Can Modernize its Policy Approaches for the 21st Century
Outline:
Defining Modern vs. Nostalgist Visions
Problems
- America’s biggest 21st century communications problems
- The FCC’s biggest 21st century problems
- The FCC’s worst nostalgist tendencies
- The FCC’s obsolete public interest test
Solutions
- A modern competition policy
- A modern public interest test
Recommendation: A modern FCC policy agenda
Obsolete Communications Law Research Series
Part 1: Obsolete communications law stifles innovation, harms consumers [5-2-12]
Part 2: The FCC's Public Interest Test Problem [5-21-12]
Part 3: FCC Special Access: Communications Obsolete-ism vs. Modernism [6-8-12]
Part 4: Obsolete Analysis Will Doom DOJ's Antitrust Probe of Cable [6-14-12]
Part 5: Why U.S. Communications Law is Obsolete [6-25-12]
Part 6: FCC's Slippery Slope to Regulating Content, Speech, and the Press [7-19-12]
Part 7: FCC's Over-Reliance on Obsolete Law [7-26-12]
Part 8: Google Fiber: Modern Technology, But Obsolete Policy Thinking [7-30-12]
Part 9: FCC Showcases Its Growing Obsolescence [8-23-12]
Part 10: The FCC's 1887 Railroad Regulation Mindset [8-29-12]
Part 11: U.S. Government's Obsolete and Wasteful Spectrum Hoarding and Rationing [9-7-12]
Part 12: U.S. Falling Behind the World in Auctioning Broadband Spectrum [9-24-12]
Part 13: U.S. Government's Obsolete & Dysfunctional Spectrum Management [10-5-12]
Part 14: A Welcome Catalyst for Modernizing Obsolete Communications Law [11-9-12]
Part 15: Google Fiber's Avoidance of Phone Service Makes Case for Obsolete Law [12-7-12]
Part 16: Professor Crawford's Obsolete Public Utility Thinking for Broadband [1-11-13]
Part 17: ITU in Search of Relevance in the Internet Age [2-19-13]
Part 18: Why IP Interconnection Would Break the Internet [3-15-13]
Part 19: 1G Government in a 4G World [7-16-13]
Part 20: Real vs. Contrived "Modern" FCC Policy Thinking [10-14-13]